Patients considering an independent medical review should preserve the complete treatment timeline, not just a discharge summary or a screenshot of a portal message. Original records, imaging, medication administration data, laboratory results and billing documents can reveal what happened and when. A qualified expert needs reliable context before evaluating whether care departed from an applicable professional standard.
Request the full designated record set
Ask each hospital, clinic and health plan for records covering the relevant period, including progress notes, consultation notes, nursing observations, orders, medication records, test results, imaging reports, operative records and discharge instructions. Under HIPAA, the access right generally extends to information in designated record sets, including billing and claims records, subject to exceptions. An online portal may show only part of the record.
Make a chronological inventory
Create a dated index identifying each facility, clinician, encounter, test and transfer. Record when you requested files and when they arrived. Preserve original downloads in a read-only folder and work from copies. For paper records, scan every page, including backs and attachments. If a document appears missing, ask the records department to identify what systems or custodians may hold it.
Preserve imaging and electronic context
An imaging report is not the same as the image itself. Request the underlying images in an accessible format where available. Similarly, an electronic note may have addenda or amendments; do not assume a printed PDF contains every relevant audit detail. Some audit logs or internal quality materials may not be part of the HIPAA access right and may require legal discovery. Do not represent unavailable information as evidence of wrongdoing.
Keep the patient’s account separate from the clinical record
Write a contemporaneous narrative of symptoms, communications, instructions and effects on daily life. Label recollections as recollections and distinguish them from dated documents. Keep receipts, travel costs, lost-work records and photographs if relevant. Do not alter originals or annotate directly on source files; attach notes separately so a reviewer can tell evidence from interpretation.
Ask a focused question of the expert
A useful review identifies the clinical decision, the information available at the time, the applicable standard of care, possible departures and whether those departures plausibly caused injury. An unfavorable outcome alone does not establish negligence. A reviewer should consider alternative explanations and limitations in the records. Medical specialty and jurisdiction matter when deciding who is qualified to offer an opinion.
Protect privacy and deadlines
Use secure channels for sensitive health information, confirm who is authorized to receive it and avoid posting identifiable records publicly. A records request does not necessarily pause a malpractice statute of limitations or repose period. Consult local counsel promptly when a claim may be time-sensitive. Patients can seek medical care or a second opinion independently of whether litigation is contemplated.
Frequently asked questions
Is the portal download enough? Not necessarily; request the full relevant record set. Can a patient request old records? Generally yes if maintained by the covered entity, subject to HIPAA rules. Must a provider create an explanation that does not exist? Generally no. Does a missing document prove negligence? No; investigate the gap without jumping to conclusions. Can an expert decide legal liability? An expert can inform clinical issues, but courts determine legal outcomes.
For related context, see a practical first review of potential malpractice evidence. For additional primary background, consult HHS guidance on access to medical and billing records; HHS guidance on personal representatives.
Leave a Reply